The Americas is the global leader in Lab-on-a-Chip device market owing to increasing advances in molecular biology and genetic engineering techniques as well as increasing prevalence of infectious diseases.
Europe is the second largest market and holds a healthy share in the global Lab-on-a-Chip device market due to major driving factors such as the flourishing medical device market, favorable government initiatives to promote life-science and clinical research, rising average per capita income of individuals.
The Asia-Pacific is expected to be the fastest growing market owing to the faster adaptation of healthcare technology, increasing patient pool of chronic and infectious diseases, government initiatives of healthcare reform, increasing number of CROs and research projects on environmental issues. Furthermore, key medical device players have set up their regional headquarters and manufacturing plants in Singapore, China, Japan, and Australia thus, boosting the growth of Lab-on-a-Chip device market.
The global Lab-on-a-Chip Device market is valued at xx million US$ in 2018 and will reach xx million US$ by the end of 2025, growing at a CAGR of xx% during 2019-2025. The objectives of this study are to define, segment, and project the size of the Lab-on-a-Chip Device market based on company, product type, end user and key regions.
This report studies the global market size of Lab-on-a-Chip Device in key regions like North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Central & South America and Middle East & Africa, focuses on the consumption of Lab-on-a-Chip Device in these regions.
This research report categorizes the global Lab-on-a-Chip Device market by top players/brands, region, type and end user. This report also studies the global Lab-on-a-Chip Device market status, competition landscape, market share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, sales channels and distributors.
The following manufacturers are covered in this report, with sales, revenue, market share for each company:
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Market size by Product
Market size by End User
Hospitals and Clinics
Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Companies
Academic & Research Institutes
Market size by Region
Central & South America
Rest of Central & South America
Middle East & Africa
The study objectives of this report are:
To study and analyze the global Lab-on-a-Chip Device market size (value & volume) by company, key regions, products and end user, breakdown data from 2014 to 2018, and forecast to 2025.
To understand the structure of Lab-on-a-Chip Device market by identifying its various subsegments.
To share detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks).
Focuses on the key global Lab-on-a-Chip Device companies, to define, describe and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competition landscape and recent development.
To project the value and sales volume of Lab-on-a-Chip Device submarkets, with respect to key regions.
To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Lab-on-a-Chip Device are as follows:
History Year: 2014-2018
Base Year: 2018
Estimated Year: 2019
Forecast Year 2019 to 2025
This report includes the estimation of market size for value (million US$) and volume (Units). Both top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to estimate and validate the market size of Lab-on-a-Chip Device market, to estimate the size of various other dependent submarkets in the overall market. Key players in the market have been identified through secondary research, and their market shares have been determined through primary and secondary research. All percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns have been determined using secondary sources and verified primary sources.
For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2018 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.